There is no published price for restoration contractor insurance in Texas, and any number you see quoted before an underwriter has looked at your work is a guess. What a carrier actually does is build the cost from your specific operation — and for a restoration contractor, the input that moves the number most is not the building you work out of or the trucks you drive. It is how much of your work carries an exposure the standard policy quietly refuses to cover.
That is the part owners find counterintuitive, so it is worth saying plainly before anything else. The very substances you are hired to remove — mold, the sewage in a Category 3 water loss, the smoke and soot after a fire — are treated as pollutants under the standard general-liability pollution exclusion. The loss you are most likely to cause while doing your job well is the one your base policy carves out. This guide walks the drivers that decide what a Texas restoration contractor actually pays, in roughly the order they matter.
The pollution line, and how deep it runs in your work
This is the driver that sizes the program, and it is the one a generic contractor policy gets wrong. A standard general liability policy answers for the third party hurt on your jobsite and the property you damage by accident — but it carries a pollution exclusion, and an underwriter of restoration risk reads that exclusion against the work you actually do.
Mold is the clearest case. Spread spores during a demolition, miss a hidden reservoir behind a wall, or certify a clearance that later fails, and the claim that follows is an environmental claim — carved out of the base policy and answered, if at all, by contractors pollution liability. Category 3 sewage work reads the same way, and so does the smoke-and-soot residue that a fire leaves in a structure you are hired to make clean again. So the underwriting question is never “how big is your crew.” It is: how much of your revenue touches mold, sewage, and fire remediation, and how disciplined is the containment and clearance protocol around it? An operator whose book is mostly clean-water mitigation and reconstruction prices differently from one who leads with heavy mold and environmental remediation, because the pollution exposure — not the payroll — is the thing being sized.
Your trade mix: mitigation, rebuild, and pack-out
What you do shapes what you pay, because the three phases of restoration are three different risk profiles wearing one company name.
- Mitigation — the emergency, after-the-loss phase — is where the pollution and equipment exposures concentrate: water extraction, structural drying, containment, and the deployable fleet that does it.
- Reconstruction carries a construction risk instead: the completed-operations tail on a rebuild that can follow you for years after the crew leaves, and the ordinary trade exposures of putting a structure back together.
- Contents pack-out puts other people’s property in your care, which is its own line entirely (below).
A pure mitigation shop, a full mitigation-to-rebuild general contractor, and a contents-heavy operator are three different submissions. An underwriter wants the split, because a program built for one of them is mispriced for the other two.
Your crew, and the decision Texas lets you make
Workers compensation scales with payroll, and the classifications you actually run matter as much as the figure — a crew in respirators in a contaminated crawlspace is not a clerical class.
Texas then adds a wrinkle no other state has. Comp is elective here for most private employers. A restoration contractor can legally decline it and become a non-subscriber — and owners hear “optional” and think “savings.” The trade-off is severe. A non-subscriber gives up the common-law defenses that would otherwise blunt an injury suit: contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and the fellow-employee defense (Labor Code §406.033).
Now look at what actually happens on a loss site. A technician takes a fall from a height doing storm work. Someone is hurt in a confined attic. A respirator fails during a heavy mold job. Inside the comp system those are claims in a no-fault channel. Outside it, they are negligence lawsuits against your business, argued to a jury, with your defenses stripped away before you begin. Many program and TPA relationships require comp regardless of what the state permits. The comp decision is part of an accurate quote, not a surcharge.
The drying fleet, and the contents in your care
Two more lines that a generic policy sizes wrong because it assumes your equipment sleeps in your yard and your work never touches someone else’s property.
The equipment schedule. Contractors equipment covers the dehumidifiers, air movers, air scrubbers, and generators that live on a customer’s site for the length of a dry-out — in transit, deployed where you do not control the premises, and exposed to theft. An operator running a large deployable fleet across a wide storm radius carries a real schedule; one who subcontracts the drying carries almost none.
The contents line. The moment you pack out a customer’s furniture, electronics, textiles, and documents and hold them at your facility, those goods are in your care, custody, and control — and that is exactly what the general-liability policy carves out. Bailees coverage is what answers for them. If pack-out and storage are in your mix, this line belongs in the program; if you never touch contents, it does not, and you should not pay for it.
The claims economy you operate inside
Most restoration work arrives insurer-funded — the property owner’s carrier sets the scope you are paid on, and your receivables, your program relationships, and your third-party administrator work all flow from that reality. An underwriter reads it as a business-model fact, not a coverage question. We describe that economy because it shapes your exposure; we do not advise a property owner on their own claim, and this guide does not either. What matters for your premium is the volume and the counterparties: a book weighted toward program and TPA work underwrites differently from a book of direct retail losses.
Limits, retention, and claims history
Two levers, and one of them is entirely in your hands.
Claims history moves pricing more than almost anything else on this list — not just whether you have had losses, but what they say about how the operation runs. A cluster of small water claims tells an underwriter something different from one large mold or pollution claim.
Limits and retention are a genuine choice, and the honest framing is: you are deciding how much of the small stuff you want to fund yourself in exchange for a better price on the part you cannot afford. A contractor who can absorb routine handling damage and buys a serious pollution and excess limit for the environmental and large-loss tail is usually buying insurance in the right order.
What an underwriter is actually stacking
<rect x="40" y="48" width="620" height="66" rx="9" fill="#C7683F" stroke="#12703F"/>
<text x="350" y="74" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="15" font-weight="600" fill="#1A1A1A">How deep the pollution exposure runs: mold, sewage, smoke, and soot</text>
<text x="350" y="98" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="13" font-weight="600" fill="#1A1A1A">It sizes the contractors pollution liability limit. The base policy excludes it.</text>
<rect x="40" y="126" width="620" height="46" rx="9" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#DCC9B0"/>
<text x="350" y="146" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="14" font-weight="600" fill="#12703F">The trade mix: mitigation, rebuild, and pack-out</text>
<text x="350" y="164" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" fill="#5A5048">Three phases, three risk profiles under one company name</text>
<rect x="40" y="182" width="620" height="46" rx="9" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#DCC9B0"/>
<text x="350" y="202" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="14" font-weight="600" fill="#12703F">Contaminated-environment payroll, and the non-subscriber decision</text>
<text x="350" y="220" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" fill="#5A5048">Opt out and the confined-space injury becomes a lawsuit, not a claim</text>
<rect x="40" y="238" width="620" height="46" rx="9" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#DCC9B0"/>
<text x="350" y="258" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="14" font-weight="600" fill="#12703F">The drying fleet, and the contents you hold in a pack-out</text>
<text x="350" y="276" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" fill="#5A5048">Gear deployed where you do not control the site; goods in your care</text>
<rect x="40" y="294" width="620" height="46" rx="9" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#DCC9B0"/>
<text x="350" y="314" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="14" font-weight="600" fill="#12703F">The program and TPA claims economy you operate inside</text>
<text x="350" y="332" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" fill="#5A5048">Insurer-funded volume and counterparties — described, never advised</text>
<rect x="40" y="350" width="620" height="46" rx="9" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#DCC9B0"/>
<text x="350" y="370" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="14" font-weight="600" fill="#12703F">Claims history, and the limits and retention you choose</text>
<text x="350" y="388" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" fill="#5A5048">What your losses say about how the operation actually runs</text>
<text x="350" y="416" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif" font-size="12" font-style="italic" fill="#5A5048">None of these is a price. Together they are how one gets built.</text>
The honest summary
A Texas restoration contractor is priced on exposure, not on square footage. The trucks matter, the crew matters, the storms matter — but the thing that moves the number most is how much of your work touches the mold, sewage, and fire the standard policy refuses to cover, and whether your program carries the pollution line that answers for it.
If you want to see how the coverage itself works rather than what it costs, start with contractors pollution liability — the line this whole conversation is really about — or step back to the restoration contractor insurance program and the full Texas restoration contractor insurance page. When you are ready for a number built on your real operation, start a quote. And if you test and mitigate radon rather than respond to losses, none of the above is your program: you want the radon mitigation cost guide instead.